You, me or someone else who is sitting in a developed country and who enjoys the benefit of pollution ?
Why us ? If they are enjoying the benefit then they ought to face the problems but reality is the ecosystem runs by the bottoms up approach where climate change factors affects the natural resources first and gradually move upwards. I guess it's a more of cleansing process that starts with the natural way.
The climates changes symptoms are so vivid these days that it has short-come the preliminary symptoms where the temperature is rising with rise in numbers of various types of insects and other animals are visually appearing.
Apart from that due to climate change a lot of herbal plants from the Himalayan ecosystem are vanishing, similar can be the case of minerals as well.
Nepal is a small countries where our Green house gas emission rate is even less than zero and we are facing the problems.
The big conferences like COP talk about mitigation and adaptation strategy but my question is will that help in terms of getting back of what we have lost or compromised.
I say a big NO.
So where is our voice nowhere ? They just pretend to give voices to our problems where there are less efforts done for real actions.
By doing a climate march or making people aware about the issue things won't change, The climate degradation wont stop, it's further rising with insane results.
The world has to react but with what is my concern. I do not say it matter less but does it makes our life safer is the reality check that I look for.
If this is the case then the vulnerabilities created by climates changes should be treated like global terrorism where one country or nation can attack other for spreading more pollution, only then it would make a difference......
Let's come down to reality and think what will make developed countries stop their pollution development process and we ought to move towards that path then just focusing on issues that are relevant.
The solution can be only one, it can be stopped only by stopping the pollution itself that too has major hurdles. The development of the 21 century seems to be more nature killing one and we ought to focus on that. we have to stop such development which is virtually pushing the world on the brink of extension. It fairly sounds rude but hey I am the one who is suffering due to climate change not an American or a french or a English or a Indian ...
Though as big as the conference are it may sound but these conferences lobby issues of developed countries only where there voices of developed nations and people lobby their issues of interests and politics. The big games of the conferences are more focused towards their position of saving their own ass
We need solutions not impression of action. Hypothetically let's consider if the developed countries lessen their pollution rate would it be affecting the environment and I would really doubt. As the question here is not about what has been damaged but the question here is about what would further be damaged as climate change is a vulnerable issue that works with feasibility of various element of nature. The random occurrence of the change in Geo-Thermic activities hugely affect the core atmospherics elements which internally rises the temperature.
If one element changes it affects the other elements and there is a drastic change that is occurring. If we are looking for a long terms change it cannot be processed until and unless we restore elements needed or else it would create a imbalance in the ecosystem.
It's a very complex topic but getting it down to its dynamic its not that easy, the way it is visualized, there are layers of affects that are taking place and the elements are changing that cannot be undone. The Earth ecosystem is not a a chemical lab where and which can be manipulated by developed nation. As complex as the problem we need a dynamic solution for correction where we have no guidance and solution. We are just pulling our socks in view of saving ourselves from the blame.